You want that job? Skip the cocktail, "idiot"!

Um, ya think? I thought it was common sense, but the Ross Business School at U of Michigan suggests you avoid the "Imbibing Idiot Bias" by skipping that cocktail offer at a prospective job luncheon.

Or, hell, just get Sh*tfaced and show 'em who's boss. "Imbibing Idiot Bias"?! Hey, in the words of Fredo Corleone in Godfather 2: "I'm smart! Not like everybody says... like dumb... I'm smart and I want respect!"

Is Laughing Girl blowing this lunch interview by having a glass of Chardonnay?  Happy Boy is sticking with juice.

It's smart to refrain from ordering a drink during an interview, says new research from U of M.

ANN ARBOR, Mich. — Most people don't drink alcohol while working, so it's probably not smart to order a drink during a job interview over lunch or dinner — even if the boss orders a glass of wine or beer, a new study suggests.

"Alcohol consumption plays a prominent role in many professional interactions, including job interviews, negotiations and informal meetings," says Scott Rick, assistant professor of marketing at Ross. "By introducing alcohol, managers can create a relaxed atmosphere that facilitates information exchange and relationship development.

"But merely holding an alcoholic beverage may reduce the perceived intelligence of the person holding it, in the absence of any actual reduction in cognitive performance -- a mistake we term the 'imbibing idiot bias.'"

Rick and colleague Maurice Schweitzer of the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School conducted a series of six experiments with more than 1,700 people to measure how consuming or merely holding an alcoholic beverage influences the perceived intelligence of the person drinking the glass of wine or beer.

They found that job candidates who ordered alcohol in simulated interviews were perceived as less intelligent and less hireable -- though no less likeable, honest or genuine -- than those who did not, regardless of whether the boss ordered an alcoholic beverage first.

Moreover, even if the boss ordered the drink for the job candidate (i.e., the candidate did not choose to drink), the result was the same. This suggests that the imbibing idiot bias does not reflect a belief that less intelligent people are more likely to consume alcohol, but rather an implicit association between alcohol and cognitive impairment.

"A job candidate may choose to order an alcoholic beverage because the prospective boss ordered one first," Rick said. "Although conformity is an ingratiation tactic that is commonly effective, the imbibing idiot bias suggests that following the boss' lead may backfire when alcohol is involved."

But Rick and Schweitzer say that people often fail to anticipate the imbibing idiot bias. In one of their experiments, they found that 26 percent of participants ordered an alcoholic beverage even when the boss' drink choice was unknown, while 72 percent ordered a glass of wine or beer if the boss ordered one first.

"Prescriptively, our results suggest that people attempting to manage impressions of intelligence should exercise caution when deciding whether or not to consume alcohol," Rick said. "Though we focused on job candidates, our results suggest that many individuals seeking to manage impressions (e.g., sales representatives, potential business partners, aspiring politicians) may make mistakes when choosing whether or not to consume alcohol."